Penrose Binning

Some months ago, I came up with a little joking idea: what if, instead of hexagonal or square bins, cartographers used Penrose tiles?

A Penrose tiling is a form of tessellation. It’s fun and unique in that it fills the entire plane, but has no repeats. Wikipedia has more detail about how these things are cool. Mostly, I thought of them because they look interesting and are sort of regular, without being too regular.

So for fun, I made a couple of maps using Penrose bins.

Density [Converted]-01

Population Density

US/Canada Atlas of Design sales

US/Canada Atlas of Design sales

Land Cover

Land Cover

I can think of no proper cartographic use for Penrose binning, but it’s fun to look at, and so that’s good enough for me.

To create the tiles, I found an SVG of a Penrose tiling here: http://faa.hu/new/english/parquet1/index.php. Then I pulled it into QGIS and resized it to fit appropriately on the US and part of Canada when in an Albers Equal Area conic (CM: -96º, SP1: 20º, SP 2: 60º). Then I did zonal statistics in ArcMap (for population density and land cover) or a spatial join in QGIS (for the point data of Atlas of Design sales).

If you want to give it a try yourself, I’ve put the shapefile here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/soakfi8z5cp7by6/Penrose%20Tiles.zip?dl=0.

While I can’t think of a use for this presently, who knows what the future will hold? Silly little experiments like this sometimes become valuable later on.

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Penrose Binning

  1. Pingback: Four short links: 1 May 2015 - O'Reilly Radar
  2. Pingback: 1p – Penrose Binning | Profit Goals
  3. Pingback: Lazy Reading for 2015/05/03 – DragonFly BSD Digest
  4. Pingback: A Matter of Perspective | somethingaboutmaps
  5. Pingback: TECNOLOGÍA » A Matter of Perspective
  6. Pingback: A Career Built on Side Projects | somethingaboutmaps
  7. Pingback: Hexperiment – Adventures In Mapping
  8. Pingback: Penrose map binning - MLG SMOKER$
  9. Pingback: Penrose map binning | A bunch of data
  10. If the tiling were done algorithmically (computationally expensive though it may be), an advantage of this system would be that it could better approximate shape outlines than is possible with hexagons or squares, and possibly equilateral triangles.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s